Hey, don't forget to vote!I've been perplexed about voting this time around—and maybe a tad bit more earnest. I think it's because we're back in California! Of course, for the presidential election, a vote in Colorado this year is about as important as it gets. But for all that other stuff, things just feel substantial when you're talking about California taking them on. It could change the world! Everyone everywhere is talking about Prop 8, for instance. Would they care about North Dakota's Prop 8? Not so much. Prop 2 has gotten a bunch of exposure as well—I heard Oprah did a whole show about it. Prop 2 says in a bunch of legislative mumbo-jumbo that certain farm animals need to be able to spread their wings and/or turn around and do the hokey-pokey.... :) Sounds nice. But, and here's getting to my point about voting, what do I know about the farming industry? [Uh....] What do I know about legislative mumbo-jumbo? All I know is that California's farming industry is ginormous! That's not a lot of knowledge. Hehe. I also know that the FDA exists to do things like... tell farmers when and how to make sure their animals can turn around. So why are a bunch of farming-industry know-nothings voting on something that has a major impact on the farming industry? I think animals should be able to flap their wings while they lay my breakfast eggs, sure. But for all I know (which is nothing...) Prop 2 will bankrupt California farming or something. My point is this: I shouldn't have a say in this. I'm an idiot.
There are also a number of propositions that impact the criminal justice system. Once again, what do I know about the stinking criminal justice system...? Um, nothing...? I voted against one proposition because one sentence indicated a broader definition would be used for allowing minors to be tried as adults. I'm vehemently—viscerally!—opposed to minors being tried as adults so, there you go. (And, yes, I already voted—I love being a permanent mail-in voter!) But absent a one-liner that catches my visceral attention (hehe), I'm totally lost. I'm hugely in favor of criminal rehabilitation, for instance—but the proposition allocating more resources to it might be tremendously flawed in some way the voters (who are stupid—myself included :)) could never anticipate. Why are they asking our opinion? It's pointless. It's like taking a poll from kindergartners: "what would you rather eat on our field trip—filet mignon or haggis?" Oh! Look! 58% said haggis as opposed to only 42% for filet mignon. We're having haggis! Hehe. Pointless to even ask. Isn't this why we elect representatives? So they can learn what we don't know and make educated decisions that the masses aren't qualified to make? That's the idea, I thought....
I especially love how they spell out the fiscal implications of passing or failing a certain measure. "This would cost California 85 billion dollars, compounded with interest, paid by bonds, shared with squirrels, and then potentially refunding to the budget another 31.8 trillion dollars." Are any of us supposed to know what that means? Even if you understand a thing or two about economics and finances, what do we know about our state's budget? I don't even know how much money 85 billion dollars is, let alone what that means to the state of California over 20 years, plus interest, minus squirrels. It makes me laugh! Go ahead! Give me the specifics! We'll all fool ourselves into thinking we know what we're talking about!
It's like the whole "jury of your peers" problem. Scariest thing in all our rights, if you ask me. Heaven help me—pleeeease—if I ever get to be judged by a jury of my "peers"! Peers deciding on the legalities of a case who: 1) didn't have anything better to do, so weren't excused from coming to court; 2) didn't appear to independently think, and so were not excused by the plaintiff or defense attorneys; 3) don't know a single thing about law; 4) have an average IQ of—let's be very generous—99. :) Call me crazy, but I think a case should be decided by people who actually know what they're talking about, what they're listening to, and all those pesky intricacies of the law. A random bunch off the street....? Minus any of the smart ones, since the attorneys don't like to keep them around...? Hehe (it's true). Yikes. :-|
So, yeah...voting.... About as random as a jury of your peers. That's why whoever gets the most airtime wins. Which side was better at managing money and was therefore able to purchase more tv ads? Because people will vote how their tv ad tells them to vote—we just don't know any better. Farming? Criminal justice? The maritime dock in San Diego's harbor? There is one proposition I know for sure I can wrap my head around, and that's San Diego's Prop D—making permanent the temporary ban they've had on alcohol at public beaches. Hallelujah! Please, PLEASE pass Prop D, San Diego! This most lovely of laws has made the beaches safer, less crowded, less littered.... Better in every way. :) Something I can really get behind without wondering if I don't know what I'm talking about. Simple. To the point. Basic consequences you can anticipate.... That's my kind of ballot initiative. :)
None of this is to say I don't think people should vote. We need to vote! If all the people who sit out an election because, eh, my vote doesn't count or eh, who knows about this stuff anyway, would instead try to make as informed a vote as they could, that would be a really good thing. It could change the world! Hehe. So, even though my one vote doesn't actually make a difference (and I don't really know what I'm talking about...), at least I can be part of the group that makes a difference. But, hey, legislators, do more of this yourselves! You wusses! Sending stuff to the voters...! Shameful.... Hehe.
(And here's my tv ad for all you Californians. Vote yes on Prop 1! Hurray for infrastructure! It cures an ailing economy and gives us cool things. So go for it. Hehe. And yes on Prop 3! Hurray for good Children's Hospitals! :))
(Should I have done a nastier tv ad...? Did you know that 95% of death-row inmates oppose Prop 3? Don't be a death-row inmate. YES on Prop 3. I'm a good person. . . and I approve this message. :))









