
"No problem, World. My pleasure."
Thank you for THIS!:
I think "A Perfect Achievement" may be an understatement. I love, love, LOVE this book. As diverting as the cute little Twilight series was for a short while, I've been really glad to have some quiet time lately to read something actually good. Hehe. (I don't get a whole lot of time to read! One of the reasons I rushed through the Twilight series more than I should have—it was so novel for a few days to have time!) So I reread The Plague—first time in, man, probably 7 or 8 years—and loved it even more than before. My only sorrow is that Camus didn't write in English—also, that I don't think the translation we have is as good as it could be. So I'm on the hunt for a different translation.... And then, I think, I could read this book a hundred times. So grim, but SO inspiring still. Really a fabulous work.And then I read this:
HA HA HA!! Somehow I missed the memo that this is a controversial book. I just thought it was famous for being good or something. Hehe. I was feeling so great about reading after finishing The Plague that I just had to pick up another book right away. The Catcher in the Rye is short (always appealing :)) and has been sitting on our shelf looking interesting for a while, so I dug in. Ha ha ha!! This book kills me! I'm sure plenty of people find it awfully offensive, but I thoroughly enjoyed the character. Very witty and interesting—and every time he described phoniness, I wanted to die of laughter for how right-on he was. Hahaha!! So great. I was really looking forward to whatever crisis I was sure would come in the last few pages to make the book make some beautiful sense . . . . But, um. It ended without ever making a great amount of sense. Really a bummer, too, because the character was a goodie—could have really made for a great book. If anyone can tell me what the heck this book was supposed to be saying, I'd be in your debt. Unless what you have to say is, "he realized in the end, with his sister, that he couldn't be a 'catcher in the rye,' and that kids just need to grow up on their own." No. No way. If that's what the author was really trying to get at, he did a bad job of it. And I'm willing to believe that maybe this is a good book and I just missed the point—so fill me in if you know what it is. :)
Next on my list: Heart of Darkness. Can you believe I've never read it?
